On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:26:41AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> The kfunc can be used to read fsverity_digest, so that we can verify
> signature in BPF LSM.
>
> This kfunc is added to fs/verity/measure.c because some data structure used
> in the function is private to fsverity (fs/verity/fsverity_private.h).
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/verity/measure.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/verity/measure.c b/fs/verity/measure.c
> index eec5956141da..2d4b2e6f5a5d 100644
> --- a/fs/verity/measure.c
> +++ b/fs/verity/measure.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> #include "fsverity_private.h"
>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/btf.h>
>
> /**
> * fsverity_ioctl_measure() - get a verity file's digest
> @@ -100,3 +102,67 @@ int fsverity_get_digest(struct inode *inode,
> return hash_alg->digest_size;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsverity_get_digest);
> +
> +/* bpf kfuncs */
> +__diag_push();
> +__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
> + "kfuncs which will be used in BPF programs");
> +
> +/**
> + * bpf_get_fsverity_digest: read fsverity digest of file
> + * @file: file to get digest from
> + * @digest_ptr: (out) dynptr for struct fsverity_digest
> + *
> + * Read fsverity_digest of *file* into *digest_ptr*.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, a negative value on error.
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_get_fsverity_digest(struct file *file, struct bpf_dynptr_kern *digest_ptr)
> +{
> + const struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> + struct fsverity_digest *arg = digest_ptr->data;
What alignment is guaranteed here?
> + const struct fsverity_info *vi;
> + const struct fsverity_hash_alg *hash_alg;
> + int out_digest_sz;
> +
> + if (__bpf_dynptr_size(digest_ptr) < sizeof(struct fsverity_digest))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + vi = fsverity_get_info(inode);
> + if (!vi)
> + return -ENODATA; /* not a verity file */
> +
> + hash_alg = vi->tree_params.hash_alg;
> +
> + arg->digest_algorithm = hash_alg - fsverity_hash_algs;
> + arg->digest_size = hash_alg->digest_size;
> +
> + out_digest_sz = __bpf_dynptr_size(digest_ptr) - sizeof(struct fsverity_digest);
> +
> + /* copy digest */
> + memcpy(arg->digest, vi->file_digest, min_t(int, hash_alg->digest_size, out_digest_sz));
> +
> + /* fill the extra buffer with zeros */
> + memset(arg->digest + arg->digest_size, 0, out_digest_sz - hash_alg->digest_size);
Can't 'out_digest_sz - hash_alg->digest_size' underflow?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__diag_pop();
> +
> +BTF_SET8_START(fsverity_set)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_fsverity_digest, KF_SLEEPABLE)
Should it be sleepable? Nothing in it sleeps, as far as I can tell.
> +BTF_SET8_END(fsverity_set)
> +
> +const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_fsverity_set = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .set = &fsverity_set,
> +};
static const?
> +
> +static int __init bpf_fsverity_init(void)
> +{
> + return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> + &bpf_fsverity_set);
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(bpf_fsverity_init);
Maybe this should be called by the existing fsverity_init() initcall instead of
having a brand new initcall just for this.
Also, doesn't this all need to be guarded by a kconfig such as CONFIG_BPF?
Also, it looks like I'm being signed up to maintain this. This isn't a stable
UAPI, right? No need to document this in Documentation/?
- Eric
