On 9/27/23 6:03 AM, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:50:30PM -0500, ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ruowen Qin <ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The sanitizer flag, which is supported by both clang and gcc, would make
> it easier to debug array index out-of-bounds problems in these programs.
>
> Make the Makfile smarter to detect ubsan support from the compiler and
> add the '-fsanitize=bounds' accordingly.
>
> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ruowen Qin <ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 6c707ebcebb9..90af76fa9dd8 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ endif
> TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
> TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes
> TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
> +TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(call try-run,\
> + printf "int main() { return 0; }" |\
> + $(CC) -Werror -fsanitize=bounds -x c - -o "$$TMP",-fsanitize=bounds,)
I haven't checked deeply, but could we use just cc-option? looks simpler
TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds)
jirka
Hi, thanks for your quick reply! When checking for flags, cc-option does not execute the linker, but on Fedora, an error appears and stating that "/usr/lib64/libubsan.so.1.0.0" cannot be found during linking. So I try this seemingly cumbersome way.
Ruowen
>
> TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
> TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>