Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/1] samples/bpf: Add -fsanitize=bounds to userspace programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:50:30PM -0500, ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ruowen Qin <ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The sanitizer flag, which is supported by both clang and gcc, would make
> it easier to debug array index out-of-bounds problems in these programs.
> 
> Make the Makfile smarter to detect ubsan support from the compiler and
> add the '-fsanitize=bounds' accordingly.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ruowen Qin <ruowenq2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 6c707ebcebb9..90af76fa9dd8 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ endif
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
> +TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(call try-run,\
> +	printf "int main() { return 0; }" |\
> +	$(CC) -Werror -fsanitize=bounds -x c - -o "$$TMP",-fsanitize=bounds,)

I haven't checked deeply, but could we use just cc-option? looks simpler

TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds)

jirka

>  
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux