On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 4:13 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add selftest for the fill_link_info of uprobe, kprobe and tracepoint. > The result: > > $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=fill_link_info > #79/1 fill_link_info/kprobe_link_info:OK > #79/2 fill_link_info/kretprobe_link_info:OK > #79/3 fill_link_info/kprobe_fill_invalid_user_buff:OK > #79/4 fill_link_info/tracepoint_link_info:OK > #79/5 fill_link_info/uprobe_link_info:OK > #79/6 fill_link_info/uretprobe_link_info:OK > #79/7 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info:OK > #79/8 fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info:OK > #79/9 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff:OK > #79 fill_link_info:OK > Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED > > The test case for kprobe_multi won't be run on aarch64, as it is not > supported. > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 | 3 + > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c | 369 +++++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c | 42 +++ > 3 files changed, 414 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > index 3b61e8b..b2f46b6 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > @@ -12,3 +12,6 @@ kprobe_multi_test/skel_api # libbpf: failed to load BPF sk > module_attach # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95 > fentry_test/fentry_many_args # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524 > fexit_test/fexit_many_args # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524 > +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 > +fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 > +fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_ubuff # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 BPF CI isn't happy, because s390 also needs to be updated? We'll just mark patches as 'changes requested' next time without explicit emails.
