Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Add new bpf helper bpf_for_each_cpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:54:18PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/1/23 8:29 PM, David Vernet wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:45:57PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:34 PM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > In kernel, we have a global variable
> > > > >      nr_cpu_ids (also in kernel/bpf/helpers.c)
> > > > > which is used in numerous places for per cpu data struct access.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am wondering whether we could have bpf code like
> > > > >      int nr_cpu_ids __ksym;
> > 
> > I think this would be useful in general, though any __ksym variable like
> > this would have to be const and mapped in .rodata, right? But yeah,
> > being able to R/O map global variables like this which have static
> > lifetimes would be nice.
> 
> No. There is no map here. __ksym symbol will have a ld_imm64 insn
> to load the value in the bpf code. The address will be the kernel
> address patched by libbpf.

ld_imm64 is fine. I'm talking about stores. BPF progs should not be able
to mutate these variables.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux