>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:26 AM >> To: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [PATCH] bpf, docs: fix BPF_NEG entry in instruction-set.rst >> >> This patch fixes the documentation of the BPF_NEG instruction to denote >> that it does not use the source register operand. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst >> b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst >> index 751e657973f0..6ef5534b410a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ BPF_OR 0x40 dst \|= src >> BPF_AND 0x50 dst &= src >> BPF_LSH 0x60 dst <<= (src & mask) >> BPF_RSH 0x70 dst >>= (src & mask) >> -BPF_NEG 0x80 dst = -src >> +BPF_NEG 0x80 dst = -dst >> BPF_MOD 0x90 dst = (src != 0) ? (dst % src) : dst >> BPF_XOR 0xa0 dst ^= src >> BPF_MOV 0xb0 dst = src >> -- >> 2.30.2 > > Acked-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Also, all changes to files in the standardization directory should also be cc'ed > to bpf@xxxxxxxx, which I am doing on this email. Will do in future posts. Thanks for CCing. > Dave
