RE: [PATCH] bpf, docs: fix BPF_NEG entry in instruction-set.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:26 AM
> To: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH] bpf, docs: fix BPF_NEG entry in instruction-set.rst
> 
> This patch fixes the documentation of the BPF_NEG instruction to denote
> that it does not use the source register operand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index 751e657973f0..6ef5534b410a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ BPF_OR    0x40   dst \|= src
>  BPF_AND   0x50   dst &= src
>  BPF_LSH   0x60   dst <<= (src & mask)
>  BPF_RSH   0x70   dst >>= (src & mask)
> -BPF_NEG   0x80   dst = -src
> +BPF_NEG   0x80   dst = -dst
>  BPF_MOD   0x90   dst = (src != 0) ? (dst % src) : dst
>  BPF_XOR   0xa0   dst ^= src
>  BPF_MOV   0xb0   dst = src
> --
> 2.30.2

Acked-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Also, all changes to files in the standardization directory should also be cc'ed
to bpf@xxxxxxxx, which I am doing on this email.

Dave






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux