RE: [Bpf] Review of draft-thaler-bpf-isa-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am forwarding the email below (after converting HTML to plain text)
to the mailto:bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list so replies can go to both lists.

Please use this one for any replies.

Thanks,
Dave

> From: Bpf <bpf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Watson Ladd
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 10:05 PM
> To: bpf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Bpf] Review of draft-thaler-bpf-isa-01
>
> Dear BPF wg,
>
> I took a look at the draft and think it has some issues, unsurprisingly at this stage. One is
> the specification seems to use an underspecified C pseudo code for operations vs
> defining them mathematically.
>
> The good news is I think this is very fixable although tedious.
>
> The other thornier issues are memory model etc. But the overall structure seems good
> and the document overall makes sense.
>
> Sincerely,
> Watson Ladd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux