Re: [Bpf] Review of draft-thaler-bpf-isa-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am forwarding the email below to the bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list
so replies can go to both lists.

 

Thanks,

Dave

From: Bpf <bpf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Watson Ladd
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 10:05 PM
To: bpf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [Bpf] Review of draft-thaler-bpf-isa-01

 

Dear BPF wg,

 

I took a look at the draft and think it has some issues, unsurprisingly at this stage. One is the specification seems to use an underspecified C pseudo code for operations vs defining them mathematically.

 

The good news is I think this is very fixable although tedious.

 

The other thornier issues are memory model etc. But the overall structure seems good and the document overall makes sense.

 

Sincerely,

Watson Ladd

-- 
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux