On 7/20/2023 4:15 AM, Andrew Werner wrote: > The ringbuf benchmarks print headers for each section of benchmarks. > The naming conventions lead a user of the benchmarks to some confusion. > This change is a cosmetic update to the output of that benchmark; no > changes were made to what the script actually executes. > > The back-to-back exploration of sample rates for Perfbuf and Ringbuf > have been combined into a single section. > > Some of the variables in the script were renamed for clarity; b is > always a benchmark name, s is a sampling rate, n is a number of > producers. Before the change, b was the only variable. > > After: > ``` > Parallel producer > ================= > rb-libbpf 43.072 ± 0.165M/s (drops 0.940 ± 0.016M/s) > rb-custom 20.274 ± 0.442M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s) > pb-libbpf 1.480 ± 0.015M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s) > pb-custom 1.492 ± 0.023M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s) > ...... > > ``` > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
