> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2023年7月20日 11:46
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> ast@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; hawk@xxxxxxxxxx;
> john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>; Shenwei
> Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: add XDP_TX feature support
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:37:09 +0800 Wei Fang wrote:
> > - xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> > + if (txq->tx_buf[index].type == FEC_TXBUF_T_XDP_NDO)
> > + xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> > + else
> > + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
>
> Are you taking budget into account? When NAPI is called with budget of 0 we
> are *not* in napi / softirq context. You can't be processing any XDP tx under
> such conditions (it may be a netpoll call from IRQ context).
Actually, the fec driver never takes the budget into account for cleaning up tx BD
ring. The budget is only valid for rx.
>
> > +static int fec_enet_xdp_tx_xmit(struct net_device *ndev,
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
> > + struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq;
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + struct netdev_queue *nq;
> > + int queue, ret;
> > +
> > + queue = fec_enet_xdp_get_tx_queue(fep, cpu);
> > + txq = fep->tx_queue[queue];
> > + nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(fep->netdev, queue);
> > +
> > + __netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
> > +
> > + ret = fec_enet_txq_xmit_frame(fep, txq, xdpf, false);
> > +
> > + __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
>
> If you're reusing the same queues as the stack you need to call
> txq_trans_cond_update() at some point, otherwise the stack may print a splat
> complaining the queue got stuck.
Yes, you are absolutely right. I'll add txq_trans_cond_update() in the next
version. Thanks!
