On 7/9/23 22:36, Siddh Raman Pant wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jul 2023 20:51:15 +0530, Khalid Masum wrote: >> However, something to think about is: If future versions of clang, llvm etc >> do not support compiling our code as it is now, it may become misleading. > > When that happens, the max version can be added in. > > Though, it would be an indicator to problems in the code IMO, > which would need some updates and fixes. > > So nothing to worry about now. > > Anh should send v3 instead of replying though. I would also suggest > to shorten the commit title if possible. > > Thanks, > Siddh > Thank you! Will send a new version accordingly. But I'd like to admit that the v2 in this patch's title is a mistake. This should be v1 so I'll send a v2 patch for this discussion.
