From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 01:54:04 +0000
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 2023年7月6日 19:59
>> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; ast@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> hawk@xxxxxxxxxx; john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx; Shenwei Wang
>> <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>;
>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>;
>> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 2/4] net: fec: recycle pages for transmitted XDP
>> frames
>>
>> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 16:10:10 +0800
>>
>>> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Once the XDP frames have been successfully transmitted through the
>>> ndo_xdp_xmit() interface, it's the driver responsibility to free the
>>> frames so that the page_pool can recycle the pages and reuse them.
>>> However, this action is not implemented in the fec driver.
>>> This leads to a user-visible problem that the console will print the
>>> following warning log.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + if (txq->tx_buf[i].xdp) {
>>> + xdp_return_frame(txq->tx_buf[i].xdp);
>>> + txq->tx_buf[i].xdp = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* restore default tx buffer type: FEC_TXBUF_T_SKB */
>>> + txq->tx_buf[i].type = FEC_TXBUF_T_SKB;
>>
>> Here and in the related places below: maybe set ::type dynamically when
>> sending to either SKB or XDP instead of setting it only for XDP and then
>> restoring each time?
> I also considered this method. but when the skb has frags or needs to be TSO,
> only the last tx_buf of the skb needs to store the skb pointer, but all the tx_buf
> of the skb needs to set the type explicitly, I think it is a bit mess and not concise.
> So I restore the type to default when recycle the BDs. Anyway, it;s just a difference
> in implement, if you guys insist it's better to set the type explicitly, I will modify
> the patch. Thanks!
Just more of personal preference, no problems. Moreover, your
explanation makes sense to me.
>>
>>> }
>>> +
>>> bdp->cbd_bufaddr = cpu_to_fec32(0);
>>> bdp = fec_enet_get_nextdesc(bdp, &txq->bd);
>>> }
>> [...]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olek
Thanks,
Olek
