On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 11:00:15AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Will it become helpful to split the proposed patch into smaller update steps? > > > > This is kind of why the series is 13 patches long, I'm not seeing why > > you think the following stats qualify as "long": > > It seems that we came along different expectations for a desirable change granularity. > Intentions influence how known “code problems” can be adjusted (also for this update step). > > How should following change ideas be handled then? > > 1. Deletion of the macro “ABORT_ON” > > 2. Addition of a comment for a special check > > 3. Introduction of another error message for one failure mode > > > Would you like to adjust the change description another bit? Please no, it's fine.
