On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:40 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> Prefer informative messages rather than none with ABORT_ON. Document > >>> one failure mode and add an error message for another. > >> > >> Does such a wording really fit to the known requirement “Solve only one problem per patch.”? > >> > >> See also: > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.4#n81 > > > > Sorry your explanation isn't clear. > > Do you really find the application of the linked development documentation unclear > in this case? > > > > Sorry your explanation isn't clear. Please can you elaborate. > > Will it become helpful to split the proposed patch into smaller update steps? This is kind of why the series is 13 patches long, I'm not seeing why you think the following stats qualify as "long": 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Thanks, Ian > Regards, > Markus
