[RFC v2 PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This series adds a mechanism for maps to populate per-cpu counters of elements
on insertions/deletions. The sum of these counters can be accessed by a new
kfunc from a map iterator program.

The following patches are present in the series:

  * Patch 1 adds a generic per-cpu counter to struct bpf_map
  * Patch 2 utilizes this mechanism for hash-based maps
  * Patch 3 extends the preloaded map iterator to dump the sum
  * Patch 4 adds a self-test for the change

The reason for adding this functionality in our case (Cilium) is to get
signals about how full some heavy-used maps are and what the actual dynamic
profile of map capacity is. In the case of LRU maps this is impossible to get
this information anyhow else. See also [1].

This is a v2 for the https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230531110511.64612-1-aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
It was rewritten according to previous comments.  I've turned this series into
an RFC for two reasons:

1) This patch only works on systems where this_cpu_{inc,dec} is atomic for s64.
For systems which might write s64 non-atomically this would be required to use
some locking mechanism to prevent readers from reading trash via the
bpf_map_sum_elements_counter() kfunc (see patch 1)

2) In comparison with the v1, we're adding extra instructions per map operation
(for preallocated maps, as well as for non-preallocated maps). The only
functionality we're interested at the moment is the number of elements present
in a map, not a per-cpu statistics. This could be better achieved by using
the v1 version, which only adds computations for preallocated maps.

So, the question is: won't it be fine to do the changes in the following way:

  * extend the preallocated hash maps to populate percpu batch counters as in v1
  * add a kfunc as in v2 to get the current sum

This works as

  * nobody at the moment actually requires the per-cpu statistcs
  * this implementation can be transparently turned into per-cpu statistics, if
    such a need occurs on practice (the only thing to change would be to
    re-implement the kfunc and, maybe, add more kfuncs to get per-cpu stats)
  * the "v1 way" is the least intrusive: it only affects preallocated maps, as
    other maps already provide the required functionality

  [1] https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1368/

v1 -> v2:
- make the counters generic part of struct bpf_map
- don't use map_info and /proc/self/fdinfo in favor of a kfunc

Anton Protopopov (4):
  bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions
  bpf: populate the per-cpu insertions/deletions counters for hashmaps
  bpf: make preloaded map iterators to display map elements count
  selftests/bpf: test map percpu stats

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  30 +
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 102 ++--
 kernel/bpf/map_iter.c                         |  48 +-
 kernel/bpf/preload/iterators/iterators.bpf.c  |   9 +-
 .../iterators/iterators.lskel-little-endian.h | 513 +++++++++---------
 .../bpf/map_tests/map_percpu_stats.c          | 336 ++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_percpu_stats.c    |  24 +
 7 files changed, 766 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_percpu_stats.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_percpu_stats.c

-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux