Jose E. Marchesi <jemarch@xxxxxxx> writes: [...] > I wonder. Lets suppose the ABI and ELF extensions are maintained and evolved > in the usual way it is done for all other architectures, i.e. > in the kernel git repository or a dedicatd public one, in textual form, under a > free software license, not requiring copyright assignments nor bureocratic > processes to be updated, etc. Let's not confuse code and documentation. Here we are discussing documentation not code. For documentation, see the RISC-V standard in my previous email. The calling convention document isn't part of a kernel git repository, it's part of a standards group that is specific to RISC-V. That's what we're talking about here. Dave
