David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong), there isn't really a
> precedence for standardizing ABIs like this. For example, x86 calling
All of the eBPF work seems unprecedented.
I don't see having this in the charter is a problem.
We may fail to get consensus on it, and not make a milestone, but I don't see
a reason not to be allowed to talk about this.
(and maybe in the end, it's a no-op)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Bpf mailing list Bpf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
