Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrii,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrii-Nakryiko/bpf-factor-out-fetching-basic-kfunc-metadata/20230308-115539
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308035416.2591326-4-andrii%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops
config: hexagon-randconfig-r015-20230305 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230308/202303082209.VIxMyiGz-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 67409911353323ca5edf2049ef0df54132fa1ca7)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/8f263e1296a91ff154a033d7cffbac3ee0ebf2ae
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Andrii-Nakryiko/bpf-factor-out-fetching-basic-kfunc-metadata/20230308-115539
        git checkout 8f263e1296a91ff154a033d7cffbac3ee0ebf2ae
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon olddefconfig
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/bpf/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082209.VIxMyiGz-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/bpf/verifier.c:7:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from kernel/bpf/verifier.c:7:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from kernel/bpf/verifier.c:7:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1244:23: warning: variable 'j' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
                   if (slot->slot_type[j] == STACK_ITER)
                                       ^
   kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1229:15: note: initialize the variable 'j' to silence this warning
           int spi, i, j;
                        ^
                         = 0
   7 warnings generated.


vim +/j +1244 kernel/bpf/verifier.c

  1224	
  1225	static bool is_iter_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
  1226					     struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int nr_slots)
  1227	{
  1228		struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
  1229		int spi, i, j;
  1230	
  1231		/* For -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots), we
  1232		 * will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later, so
  1233		 * return true for that case.
  1234		 */
  1235		spi = iter_get_spi(env, reg, nr_slots);
  1236		if (spi == -ERANGE)
  1237			return true;
  1238		if (spi < 0)
  1239			return spi;
  1240	
  1241		for (i = 0; i < nr_slots; i++) {
  1242			struct bpf_stack_state *slot = &state->stack[spi - i];
  1243	
> 1244			if (slot->slot_type[j] == STACK_ITER)
  1245				return false;
  1246		}
  1247	
  1248		return true;
  1249	}
  1250	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux