Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:44 AM Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/14/23 18:58, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 02/14, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> >> bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() was creating a dummy bpf_link as a
> >> placeholder, but now it is constructing an authentic one by calling
> >> bpf_link_create() if the map has the BPF_F_LINK flag.
> >
> >> You can flag a struct_ops map with BPF_F_LINK by calling
> >> bpf_map__set_map_flags().
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>   1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> index 75ed95b7e455..1eff6a03ddd9 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> @@ -11430,29 +11430,41 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(const
> >> struct bpf_program *prog)
> >>       return link;
> >>   }
> >
> >> +struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map {
> >> +    struct bpf_link link;
> >> +    int map_fd;
> >> +};
> >
> > Ah, ok, now you're adding bpf_link_struct_ops_map. I guess I'm now
> > confused why you haven't done it in the first patch :-/
>
> Just won't to mix the libbpf part and kernel part in one patch.

Ah, shoot, I completely missed that it's libbpf. So in this case, can
we use the same strategy for the kernel links? Instead of a union,
have an outer struct + container_of? If not, why not?


>
> >
> > And what are these fake bpf_links? Can you share more about it means?
>
> For the next version, I will detail it in the commit log. In a nutshell,
> before this point, there was no bpf_link for struct_ops. Libbpf
> attempted to create an equivalent interface to other BPF programs by
> providing a simulated bpf_link instead of a true one from the kernel;
> that fake bpf_link stores FDs associated with struct_ops maps rather
> than real bpf_links.
>
>
> >
> >> +
> >>   static int bpf_link__detach_struct_ops(struct bpf_link *link)
> >>   {
> >> +    struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map *st_link;
> >>       __u32 zero = 0;
> >
> >> -    if (bpf_map_delete_elem(link->fd, &zero))
> >> +    st_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map, link);
> >> +
> >> +    if (st_link->map_fd < 0) {
> >> +        /* Fake bpf_link */
> >> +        if (bpf_map_delete_elem(link->fd, &zero))
> >> +            return -errno;
> >> +        return 0;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    if (bpf_map_delete_elem(st_link->map_fd, &zero))
> >> +        return -errno;
> >> +
> >> +    if (close(link->fd))
> >>           return -errno;
> >
> >>       return 0;
> >>   }
> >
> >> -struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
> >> +/*
> >> + * Update the map with the prepared vdata.
> >> + */
> >> +static int bpf_map__update_vdata(const struct bpf_map *map)
> >>   {
> >>       struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
> >> -    struct bpf_link *link;
> >>       __u32 i, zero = 0;
> >> -    int err;
> >> -
> >> -    if (!bpf_map__is_struct_ops(map) || map->fd == -1)
> >> -        return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
> >> -
> >> -    link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
> >> -    if (!link)
> >> -        return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
> >
> >>       st_ops = map->st_ops;
> >>       for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(st_ops->type); i++) {
> >> @@ -11468,17 +11480,48 @@ struct bpf_link
> >> *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
> >>           *(unsigned long *)kern_data = prog_fd;
> >>       }
> >
> >> -    err = bpf_map_update_elem(map->fd, &zero, st_ops->kern_vdata, 0);
> >> +    return bpf_map_update_elem(map->fd, &zero, st_ops->kern_vdata, 0);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map *link;
> >> +    int err, fd;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!bpf_map__is_struct_ops(map) || map->fd == -1)
> >> +        return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
> >> +
> >> +    link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
> >> +    if (!link)
> >> +        return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
> >> +
> >> +    err = bpf_map__update_vdata(map);
> >>       if (err) {
> >>           err = -errno;
> >>           free(link);
> >>           return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
> >>       }
> >
> >> -    link->detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
> >> -    link->fd = map->fd;
> >> +    link->link.detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
> >
> >> -    return link;
> >> +    if (!(map->def.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)) {
> >> +        /* Fake bpf_link */
> >> +        link->link.fd = map->fd;
> >> +        link->map_fd = -1;
> >> +        return &link->link;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    fd = bpf_link_create(map->fd, -1, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAP, NULL);
> >> +    if (fd < 0) {
> >> +        err = -errno;
> >> +        free(link);
> >> +        return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    link->link.fd = fd;
> >> +    link->map_fd = map->fd;
> >> +
> >> +    return &link->link;
> >>   }
> >
> >>   typedef enum bpf_perf_event_ret (*bpf_perf_event_print_t)(struct
> >> perf_event_header *hdr,
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux