On 2/12/23 10:07 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
Set xdp_features netdevice flag if lan966x nic supports xdp mode.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 580c91d24a52..b24e55e61dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -823,6 +823,11 @@ static int lan966x_probe_port(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 p,
port->phylink = phylink;
+ if (lan966x->fdma)
+ dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC |
+ NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
+ NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT;
+
err = register_netdev(dev);
if (err) {
dev_err(lan966x->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
Since the xdp-features series is now merged in net-next, do you think it is
better to target this patch to net-next?
Yes, that would be better given it's a pure driver change. I moved delegate
to netdev.
Thanks,
Daniel
