> Set xdp_features netdevice flag if lan966x nic supports xdp mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> index 580c91d24a52..b24e55e61dc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> @@ -823,6 +823,11 @@ static int lan966x_probe_port(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 p,
>
> port->phylink = phylink;
>
> + if (lan966x->fdma)
> + dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC |
> + NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> + NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT;
> +
> err = register_netdev(dev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(lan966x->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
Since the xdp-features series is now merged in net-next, do you think it is
better to target this patch to net-next?
Regards,
Lorenzo
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
