On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:07 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > Compared to v2, I followed the review from Alexei which cleaned up the > > code a little bit. > > > > I also got a kbuild test bot complaining[3] so add a fix for that too. > > > > For reference, here is the previous cover letter: > > > > So this patch series aims at solving both [0] and [1]. > > > > The first one is bpf related and concerns the ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION API. > > It is considered as a hack to begin with, so introduce a proper kernel > > API to declare when a BPF hook can have its return value changed. > > > > The second one is related to the fact that > > DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS is currently not enabled on arm64, and > > that means that the current HID-BPF implementation doesn't work there > > for now. > > > > The first patch actually touches the bpf core code, but it would be > > easier if we could merge it through the hid tree in the for-6.2/hid-bpf > > branch once we get the proper acks. > > For the series: > > Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> Thanks. I have applied the rest of the series to for-6.2/hid-bpf. Cheers, Benjamin > > Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs >
