On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Compared to v2, I followed the review from Alexei which cleaned up the > code a little bit. > > I also got a kbuild test bot complaining[3] so add a fix for that too. > > For reference, here is the previous cover letter: > > So this patch series aims at solving both [0] and [1]. > > The first one is bpf related and concerns the ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION API. > It is considered as a hack to begin with, so introduce a proper kernel > API to declare when a BPF hook can have its return value changed. > > The second one is related to the fact that > DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS is currently not enabled on arm64, and > that means that the current HID-BPF implementation doesn't work there > for now. > > The first patch actually touches the bpf core code, but it would be > easier if we could merge it through the hid tree in the for-6.2/hid-bpf > branch once we get the proper acks. For the series: Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
