Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:37:42 -0800
Cc: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, yhs@xxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <DU0P192MB154719A31758750149418C73D61B9@DU0P192MB1547.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On 12/6/22 8:35 AM, Ji Rongfeng wrote:

I have noticed that this patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" for a fewdays, but there's no comment so far, which is abnormal and confusing.


It is obvious that a test is needed for this change.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
  - From: Ji Rongfeng

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
  - From: Ji Rongfeng
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
  - From: Ji Rongfeng

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Proper R0 zero-extension for BPF_CALL instructions
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux