Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
- From: Ji Rongfeng <SikoJobs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:35:57 +0800
- Cc: martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, yhs@xxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <DU0P192MB1547FE6F35CC1A3EEA1AFDECD6179@DU0P192MB1547.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
I have noticed that this patch has been marked as "Changes Requested"
for a few days, but there's no comment so far, which is abnormal and
confusing. I will resend this patch with updated documentation a few
days later. Please let me know if there're any suggestions. Thanks!
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Samsung SoC]
[Linux Rockchip SoC]
[Linux Actions SoC]
[Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]