Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, docs: Correct the example of BPF_XOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/11/30 02:54, David Vernet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:45:58PM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
Refer to description of BPF_XOR, dst_reg should be used but not src_reg
in the examples.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 5d798437dad4..e672d5ec6cc7 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ BPF_END   0xd0   byte swap operations (see `Byte swap instructions`_ below)
``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU`` means:: - src_reg = (u32) src_reg ^ (u32) imm32
+  dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg ^ (u32) imm32

Shouldn't this be

dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg ^ (u32) src_reg

Same idea below for 64 bit

See Chapter 'Instruction classes', BPF_K means "use 32-bit immediate as source operand", so it should be 'imm32' instead of 'src_reg'.


``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU64`` means:: - src_reg = src_reg ^ imm32
+  dst_reg = dst_reg ^ imm32
Byte swap instructions
--
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux