Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Remove unnecessary RCU grace period chaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:39:42 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Now bpf uses RCU grace period chaining to wait for the completion of
> access from both sleepable and non-sleepable bpf program: calling
> call_rcu_tasks_trace() firstly to wait for a RCU-tasks-trace grace
> period, then in its callback calls call_rcu() or kfree_rcu() to wait for
> a normal RCU grace period.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/4] rcu-tasks: Provide rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e6c86c513f44
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/4] bpf: Use rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() in bpf memory allocator
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/59be91e5e70a
  - [bpf-next,v2,3/4] bpf: Use rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() in local storage map
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d39d1445d377
  - [bpf-next,v2,4/4] bpf: Use rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() for program array freeing
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4835f9ee980c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux