Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 05/32] bpf: Support kptrs in local storage maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/4/22 1:41 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index 7ea18d4da84b..6786d00f004e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_elem {
  	struct hlist_node snode;	/* Linked to bpf_local_storage */
  	struct bpf_local_storage __rcu *local_storage;
  	struct rcu_head rcu;
-	/* 8 bytes hole */
+	struct bpf_map *map;		/* Only set for bpf_selem_free_rcu */

Instead of adding another map ptr and using the last 8 bytes hole,

  	/* The data is stored in another cacheline to minimize
  	 * the number of cachelines access during a cache hit.
  	 */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 802fc15b0d73..4a725379d761 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner,
  				gfp_flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
  	if (selem) {
  		if (value)
-			memcpy(SDATA(selem)->data, value, smap->map.value_size);
+			copy_map_value(&smap->map, SDATA(selem)->data, value);
+		/* No call to check_and_init_map_value as memory is zero init */
  		return selem;
  	}
@@ -92,12 +93,27 @@ void bpf_local_storage_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
  	kfree_rcu(local_storage, rcu);
  }
+static void check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	if (map_value_has_kptrs(selem->map))

could SDATA(selem)->smap->map be used here ?

+		bpf_map_free_kptrs(selem->map, SDATA(selem));
+}
+
  static void bpf_selem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
  {
  	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
selem = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_local_storage_elem, rcu);
-	kfree_rcu(selem, rcu);
+	check_and_free_fields(selem);
+	kfree(selem);
+}
+
+static void bpf_selem_free_tasks_trace_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
+
+	selem = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_local_storage_elem, rcu);
+	call_rcu(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_rcu);
  }
/* local_storage->lock must be held and selem->local_storage == local_storage.
@@ -150,10 +166,11 @@ bool bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
  	    SDATA(selem))
  		RCU_INIT_POINTER(local_storage->cache[smap->cache_idx], NULL);
+ selem->map = &smap->map;
  	if (use_trace_rcu)
-		call_rcu_tasks_trace(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_rcu);
+		call_rcu_tasks_trace(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_tasks_trace_rcu);
  	else
-		kfree_rcu(selem, rcu);
+		call_rcu(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_rcu);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux