Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpf: x86: Support in-register struct arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/29/22 4:10 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:11:51AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:

SNIP

-static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
-			 int regs_off)
+static void __save_struct_arg_regs(u8 **prog, int curr_reg_idx, int nr_regs,
+				   int struct_val_off, int stack_start_idx)
  {
-	int i;
+	int i, reg_idx;
+
+	/* Save struct registers to stack.
+	 * For example, argument 1 (second argument) size is 16 which occupies two
+	 * registers, these two register values will be saved in stack.
+	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x40],rsi
+	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38],rdx
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_regs; i++) {
+		reg_idx = curr_reg_idx + i;
+		emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(8),
+			 BPF_REG_FP,
+			 reg_idx == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + reg_idx,
+			 -(struct_val_off - stack_start_idx * 8));
+		stack_start_idx++;
+	}
+}
+
+static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
+		      int regs_off, int struct_val_off)
+{
+	int curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx, curr_s_stack_off;
+	int s_size, s_arg_idx, s_arg_nregs;
+
+	curr_arg_idx = curr_reg_idx = curr_s_stack_off = 0;
+	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_STRUCT_ARGS; i++) {
+		s_size = m->struct_arg_bsize[i];
+		if (!s_size)
+			return __save_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, nr_args - curr_arg_idx,
+						      curr_reg_idx, regs_off);

could we just do break in here instead?

Thanks for pointing out. Yes, we can just do break and later call
__save_normal_arg_regs(...) will handle this automatically.
The same for another place you pointed below.


SNIP

+
+static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
+			 int regs_off, int struct_val_off)
+{
+	int curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx, curr_s_stack_off;
+	int s_size, s_arg_idx, s_arg_nregs;
+
+	curr_arg_idx = curr_reg_idx = curr_s_stack_off = 0;
+	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_STRUCT_ARGS; i++) {
+		s_size = m->struct_arg_bsize[i];
+		if (!s_size)
+			return __restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx,
+							 nr_args - curr_arg_idx,
+							 curr_reg_idx, regs_off);

same here

jirka

+
+		s_arg_idx = m->struct_arg_idx[i];
+		s_arg_nregs = (s_size + 7) / 8;
+
+		__restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx,
+					  curr_reg_idx, regs_off);
+		__restore_struct_arg_regs(prog, curr_reg_idx + s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx,
+					  s_arg_nregs, struct_val_off, curr_s_stack_off);
+		curr_reg_idx += s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx + s_arg_nregs;
+		curr_s_stack_off += s_arg_nregs;
+		curr_arg_idx = s_arg_idx + 1;
+	}
+
+	__restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, nr_args - curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx,
+				  regs_off);
  }

SNIP



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux