Re: [PATCH] bpf: make sure mac_header was set before using it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/7/22 8:40 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:36 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 8:31 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:20 AM <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)

Are we sure it's bpf tree material?
The fixes tag points to net-next tree.

Fix is generic and should not harm bpf tree, or any tree if that matters.

Right. Just trying to understand the urgency/severity
considering we're at rc5.

The Fixes tag points to the warning that has been added. I understand more
as a reference rather than the actual underlying bug that syzkaller was
able to trigger w/ classic bpf. So yeah, bpf tree seems reasonable, imho,
but also low risk from patch diff itself.

Thanks,
Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux