On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:45 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 7:01 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Let's use a macro DEFAULT_BPFFS instead of the hard-coded "/sys/fs/bpf".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 2 +-
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 6 ++++--
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> > index 44df982d2a5c..9161ebcd3466 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def {
> >
> > enum libbpf_pin_type {
> > LIBBPF_PIN_NONE,
> > - /* PIN_BY_NAME: pin maps by name (in /sys/fs/bpf by default) */
> > + /* PIN_BY_NAME: pin maps by name (in DEFAULT_BPFFS by default) */
>
> how is this improving things? now I need to grep some more to find out
> what's the value of DEFAULT_BPFFS is
>
The new added one also uses the "/sys/fs/bpf", so I defined a macro
for them, then they can be kept the same.
I won't change it if you object to it.
[snip]
--
Regards
Yafang
