Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sat,  9 Apr 2022 12:59:54 +0000 you wrote:
> We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
> not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
> libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.
> 
> This patchset cleanups the usage of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in tools/bpf/,
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf and samples/bpf. The file
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h is removed. The included header
> sys/resource.h is removed from many files as it is useless in these files.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b25acdafd373
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/4] selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b858ba8c52b6
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/4] bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a777e18f1bcd
  - [bpf-next,v4,4/4] tools/runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/451b5fbc2c56

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux