Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Fixes for sock_fields selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> I think we have reached a consensus [1] on how the test for the 4-byte load from
> bpf_sock->dst_port and bpf_sk_lookup->remote_port should look, so here goes v3.
> 
> I will submit a separate set of patches for bpf_sk_lookup->remote_port tests.
> 
> 
> This series has been tested on x86_64 and s390 on top of recent bpf-next -
> ad13baf45691 ("selftests/bpf: Test subprog jit when toggle bpf_jit_harden
> repeatedly").
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87k0cwxkzs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> - Split what was previously patch 2 which was doing two things
> - Use BPF_TCP_* constants (Martin)
> - Treat the result of 4-byte load from dst_port as a 16-bit value (Martin)
> - Typo fixup and some rewording in patch 4 description
Thanks for your work on this and reached a resolution with the remote_port !

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux