Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] selftests/bpf: Update tests for new errstr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:58 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Verifier for negative offset case returns a different, more clear error
> message. Update existing verifier selftests to work with that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c              | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c
> index 91869aea6d64..3931c481e30c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
>                 BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>         },
>         .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
> -       .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
> +       .errstr = "negative offset ctx ptr R1 off=-1 disallowed",

Should this be a part of patch 3 to avoid breaking bisect?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux