Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/14] libbpf: Add PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:16 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Depending on whether or not an arch has ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER,
> syscall arguments must be accessed through a different set of
> registers. Provide PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS macro to abstract away
> that difference.
>
> Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Again, there was nothing wrong with the way you did it in v3, please
revert to that one.

>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> index 82f1e935d549..7a015ee8fb11 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
>
>  #if defined(bpf_target_x86)
>
> +#define __BPF_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
> +
>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__VMLINUX_H__)
>
>  #define __PT_PARM1_REG di
> @@ -114,6 +116,8 @@
>
>  #elif defined(bpf_target_s390)
>
> +#define __BPF_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
> +
>  /* s390 provides user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
>  #define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const user_pt_regs *)(x))
>  #define __PT_PARM1_REG gprs[2]
> @@ -142,6 +146,8 @@
>
>  #elif defined(bpf_target_arm64)
>
> +#define __BPF_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
> +
>  /* arm64 provides struct user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
>  #define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const struct user_pt_regs *)(x))
>  #define __PT_PARM1_REG regs[0]
> @@ -344,6 +350,17 @@ struct pt_regs;
>
>  #endif /* defined(bpf_target_defined) */
>
> +/*
> + * When invoked from a syscall handler BPF_KPROBE, returns a pointer to a
> + * struct pt_regs containing syscall arguments, that is suitable for passing to
> + * PT_REGS_PARMn_SYSCALL() and PT_REGS_PARMn_CORE_SYSCALL().
> + */
> +#ifdef __BPF_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
> +#define PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS(ctx) ((struct pt_regs *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx))
> +#else
> +#define PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS(ctx) ctx
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifndef ___bpf_concat
>  #define ___bpf_concat(a, b) a ## b
>  #endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux