Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@xxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a8f1426b0367..2cb86972ed35 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2398,7 +2398,7 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
if (insn->code == 0)
return 0;
- if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL) {
+ if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) {
verbose(env, "regs=%x stack=%llx before ", *reg_mask, *stack_mask);
verbose(env, "%d: ", idx);
print_bpf_insn(&cbs, insn, env->allow_ptr_leaks);
@@ -2656,7 +2656,7 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
u32 history = st->jmp_history_cnt;
- if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL)
+ if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
verbose(env, "last_idx %d first_idx %d\n", last_idx, first_idx);
for (i = last_idx;;) {
if (skip_first) {
@@ -2743,7 +2743,7 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
new_marks = true;
reg->precise = true;
}
- if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL) {
+ if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) {
mark_verifier_state_scratched(env);
verbose(env, "parent %s regs=%x stack=%llx marks:",
new_marks ? "didn't have" : "already had",
--
2.30.2
