On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:04:35 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > My understanding that patch 4 is the key.
> > I think the bpf-link.h bpf-cgroup-types.h and bpf-cgroup-storage.h
> > are too specific. We don't do a header file per type.
> > Maybe combine them all into one bpf-cgroup-types.h ?
> > That will still achieve the separation of cgroup from linux/bpf.h
The dependency tree is
bpf-link.h bpf-cgroup-types.h
^ ^
| /
bpf.h bpf-cgroup.h
^ ^
| |
| |
bpf-cgroup-storage.h
I can't merge bpf-cgroup-storage.h with the rest, it'd be a loop.
Should I leave that one be separate? Any other ideas?
