> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:03:58 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > Can you please check if the code above is aligned to current requirements or if > > it is missing something? > > If this code it is fine, I guess we have two option here: > > - integrate the commits above in xdp multi-buff series (posting v15) and work on > > the verfier code in parallel (if xdp_mb_pointer helper is not required from day0) > > - integrate verfier changes in xdp multi-buff series, drop bpf_xdp_load_bytes > > helper (probably we will still need bpf_xdp_store_bytes) and introduce > > bpf_xdp_pointer as new ebpf helper. > > It wasn't clear to me that we wanted bpf_xdp_load_bytes() to exist. > But FWIW no preference here. > ack, same here. Any other opinion about it? Regards, Lorenzo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
