On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:03:58 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Can you please check if the code above is aligned to current requirements or if > it is missing something? > If this code it is fine, I guess we have two option here: > - integrate the commits above in xdp multi-buff series (posting v15) and work on > the verfier code in parallel (if xdp_mb_pointer helper is not required from day0) > - integrate verfier changes in xdp multi-buff series, drop bpf_xdp_load_bytes > helper (probably we will still need bpf_xdp_store_bytes) and introduce > bpf_xdp_pointer as new ebpf helper. It wasn't clear to me that we wanted bpf_xdp_load_bytes() to exist. But FWIW no preference here.
