Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: test new btf__add_btf() API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:05 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:47 PM, andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add a test that validates that btf__add_btf() API is correctly copying
> > all the types from the source BTF into destination BTF object and
> > adjusts type IDs and string offsets properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c      | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> > index aa4505618252..75fd280f75b2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> > @@ -342,8 +342,94 @@ static void test_btf_add()
> >       btf__free(btf);
> > }
> >
> > +static void test_btf_add_btf()
> > +{
> > +     struct btf *btf1 = NULL, *btf2 = NULL;
> > +     int id;
> > +
> > +     btf1 = btf__new_empty();
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf1, "btf1"))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     btf2 = btf__new_empty();
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf2, "btf2"))
> > +             return;
> We need goto cleanup here, no?
>

yep, my bad, will fix

> Thanks,
> Song



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux