Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: test new btf__add_btf() API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:47 PM, andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add a test that validates that btf__add_btf() API is correctly copying
> all the types from the source BTF into destination BTF object and
> adjusts type IDs and string offsets properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c      | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> index aa4505618252..75fd280f75b2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_write.c
> @@ -342,8 +342,94 @@ static void test_btf_add()
> 	btf__free(btf);
> }
> 
> +static void test_btf_add_btf()
> +{
> +	struct btf *btf1 = NULL, *btf2 = NULL;
> +	int id;
> +
> +	btf1 = btf__new_empty();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf1, "btf1"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	btf2 = btf__new_empty();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf2, "btf2"))
> +		return;
We need goto cleanup here, no?

Thanks,
Song



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux