On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:45:45PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:36:07PM +0400, Dmitrii Banshchikov wrote: > > /* > > - * # Generated by iptables-save v1.8.2 on Sat May 8 05:22:41 2021 > > + * Generated by iptables-save v1.8.2 on Sat May 8 05:22:41 2021 > > * *filter > ... > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.32.0.0/11 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.144.0.0/12 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.160.0.0/12 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.0.0.0/12 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.248.0.0/24 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.232.0.0/16 -j FROMDC > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.1.146.131/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT > > - * -A LOCAL -s 10.149.118.14/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT > > - * -A LOCAL -p icmp -j ACCEPT > > + * :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > > + * :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] > > + * :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > > + * -A INPUT -s 1.1.1.1/32 -d 2.2.2.2/32 -j DROP > > + * -A INPUT -s 2.2.0.0/16 -d 3.0.0.0/8 -j DROP > > + * -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --sport 100 --dport 500 -j DROP > > * COMMIT > > */ > > Patch 10 adds this test, but then patch 12 removes most of it? > Keep both? Sorry, I missed it. I decided that the large blob looks really ugly and switched to the smaller one and forgot to cleanup the patchset. > > Also hit this on my system with older glibc: > > ../net/bpfilter/codegen.c: In function ‘codegen_push_subprog’: > ../net/bpfilter/codegen.c:67:4: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘reallocarray’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 67 | reallocarray(codegen->subprogs, subprogs_max, sizeof(codegen->subprogs[0])); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../net/bpfilter/codegen.c:66:12: warning: assignment to ‘struct codegen_subprog_desc **’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > 66 | subprogs = > | ^ > > In libbpf we have libbpf_reallocarray() for this reason. > > Could you provide an example of generated bpf program? > And maybe add Documentation/bpf/bpfilter_design.rst ? I will add documentation in the next iteration when bpf_map_for_each() subprog will be introduced. > > The tests don't build for me: > $ cd selftests/bpf/bpfilter; make > make: *** No rule to make target '-lelf', needed by '.../selftests/bpf/bpfilter/test_match'. Stop. libelf was added because libbpf depends on it. Are you able to build libbpf? > > The unit tests are great, btw. test_codegen is not end-to-end, right? > Could you add a full test with iptable command line? > or netns support is a prerequisite for it? Yeah, as net namespaces aren't supported using iptables binary will modify the root namespace. That is the reason why codegen tests aren't implemented in the end-to-end fashion and rules are represented by blobs. -- Dmitrii Banshchikov
