Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/13] bpfilter: Add filter table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:36:07PM +0400, Dmitrii Banshchikov wrote:
>  /*
> - * # Generated by iptables-save v1.8.2 on Sat May  8 05:22:41 2021
> + *  Generated by iptables-save v1.8.2 on Sat May  8 05:22:41 2021
>   * *filter
...
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.32.0.0/11 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.144.0.0/12 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.160.0.0/12 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.0.0.0/12 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.248.0.0/24 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.232.0.0/16 -j FROMDC
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.1.146.131/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT
> - * -A LOCAL -s 10.149.118.14/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT
> - * -A LOCAL -p icmp -j ACCEPT
> + * :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> + * :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> + * :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> + * -A INPUT -s 1.1.1.1/32 -d 2.2.2.2/32 -j DROP
> + * -A INPUT -s 2.2.0.0/16 -d 3.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
> + * -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --sport 100 --dport 500 -j DROP
>   * COMMIT
>   */

Patch 10 adds this test, but then patch 12 removes most of it?
Keep both?

Also hit this on my system with older glibc:

../net/bpfilter/codegen.c: In function ‘codegen_push_subprog’:
../net/bpfilter/codegen.c:67:4: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘reallocarray’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   67 |    reallocarray(codegen->subprogs, subprogs_max, sizeof(codegen->subprogs[0]));
      |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
../net/bpfilter/codegen.c:66:12: warning: assignment to ‘struct codegen_subprog_desc **’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
   66 |   subprogs =
      |            ^

In libbpf we have libbpf_reallocarray() for this reason.

Could you provide an example of generated bpf program?
And maybe add Documentation/bpf/bpfilter_design.rst ?

The tests don't build for me:
$ cd selftests/bpf/bpfilter; make
make: *** No rule to make target '-lelf', needed by '.../selftests/bpf/bpfilter/test_match'.  Stop.

The unit tests are great, btw. test_codegen is not end-to-end, right?
Could you add a full test with iptable command line?
or netns support is a prerequisite for it?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux