Re: [PATCH -tip 6/6] kprobes: Use bool type for functions which returns boolean value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 23:56 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Use the 'bool' type instead of 'int' for the functions which
> returns a boolean value, because this makes clear that those
> functions don't return any error code.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
[]
> @@ -104,25 +104,25 @@ struct kprobe {
>  #define KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE	8 /* probe is using ftrace */
>  
> 
>  /* Has this kprobe gone ? */
> -static inline int kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
> +static inline bool kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
>  {
>  	return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
>  }

This change would also allow the removal of the !! from:

kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:104:        return !!(kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp));
---
 kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index ea6178cb5e334..c6e0345a44e94 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline unsigned long trace_kprobe_offset(struct trace_kprobe *tk
 
 static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_has_gone(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
 {
-	return !!(kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp));
+	return kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp);
 }
 
 static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_within_module(struct trace_kprobe *tk,





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux