On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 23:56 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Use the 'bool' type instead of 'int' for the functions which
> returns a boolean value, because this makes clear that those
> functions don't return any error code.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
[]
> @@ -104,25 +104,25 @@ struct kprobe {
> #define KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE 8 /* probe is using ftrace */
>
>
> /* Has this kprobe gone ? */
> -static inline int kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
> +static inline bool kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
> }
This change would also allow the removal of the !! from:
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:104: return !!(kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp));
---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index ea6178cb5e334..c6e0345a44e94 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline unsigned long trace_kprobe_offset(struct trace_kprobe *tk
static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_has_gone(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
{
- return !!(kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp));
+ return kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp);
}
static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_within_module(struct trace_kprobe *tk,
