Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > -static volatile int count;
> > +int count = 0;
> > +int noise = 0;
> > +
> > +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)
> > +{
> > + __u32 key = 0;
> > +
> > + bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key);
> > + bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> This selftest patch I had to apply manually due to conflicts.
> I've also removed the noisy printk before pushing.
Thanks! I had the printk there to verify the code was actually
being run, but forgot to remove it before submitting.
> I verified that I saw the spam before removing it.
Great.
> The patch 1 looks great. Thanks a lot for the fix.
