[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: remove unneeded check for flags during detach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Coverity complained about this being unreachable code. It is right
because we already enforce flags to be unset, so a check validating the
flag value is redundant.

CID: 322808
Fixes: 715c5ce454a6 ("libbpf: Add low level TC-BPF management API")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
index d743c8721aa7..efbb50ad59d8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
@@ -675,8 +675,6 @@ static int __bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (priority > UINT16_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE)
-		return -EINVAL;
 	if (!flush) {
 		if (!handle || !priority)
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.31.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux