On 6/11/21 5:56 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote: > Hey David, > > I just tested your proposed patch and I want to confirm that it works > great for my use-case. > I get the same rule-selected route based on firewall mark as the outside > ip route get ... mark ... > Also since we didn't touch the ports, multipathing works as expected - > gives a different route > based on the hash of the socket tuple. great. > > So having said that I can't help but wonder what the next steps might be. > > Are you able/willing to incorporate this work in the kernel? I do not have the time or hardware at the moment to do the testing - or create the selftest for it. If you do have the time for the selftest, we can tag team it. > If yes I also wonder if it would be possible to backport it into 5.10 > branch? > 5.10 backports are done out of tree, so you are on your own there.
