Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 3/24/21 10:07 PM, John Fastabend wrote: > > With a relatively recent clang master branch test_map skips a section, > > > > libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(5) .rodata.str1.1 > > > > the cause is some pointless strings from bpf_printks in the BPF program > > loaded during testing. Remove them so we stop tripping our test bots. > > > > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.c | 3 --- > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.c > > index fdb4bf4408fa..0f603253f4ed 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.c > > @@ -16,10 +16,7 @@ int bpf_prog1(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > > if (data + 8 > data_end) > > return SK_DROP; > > > > - bpf_printk("data length %i\n", (__u64)msg->data_end - (__u64)msg->data); > > d = (char *)data; > > Do we still need 'd' as well in that case, or the data + 8 > data_end test if we don't > read any of the data? I'm not sure what was the original purpose of the prog, perhaps > just to test that we can attach /something/ in general? Maybe in that case empty prog > is sufficient if we don't do anything useful with the rest? This program and test existed before test_sockmap was running and doing a more complete test set. At that time it was the only thing verifying that we could read the d[] and check lengths. At this point these cases are covered there so it should be OK to just make it an empty program. Then it is _just_ testing the map attach/detach logic not that the programs themselves work correctly. By the way without d marked violatile my compiler removes the load there so its pointless as you note. Because this is used for test maps I'll just make this an empty program. > > > - bpf_printk("hello sendmsg hook %i %i\n", d[0], d[1]); > > - > > return SK_PASS; > > } > > > > >