Re: [PATCH bpf-next] docs: bpf: Clarify BPF_CMPXCHG wording

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:29 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Based on [1], BPF_CMPXCHG should always load the old value into R0. The
> phrasing in bpf.rst is somewhat ambiguous in this regard, improve it to
> make this aspect crystal clear.
>
>   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJFcFwxEz=wnV=hkie-EDwa8s5JGbBQeFt1TGux1OihJw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux